English 
Español 
Português 
Deutsch 
Français 
Kiswahili 
Hausa 
አማርኛ Your slip
Full screener →—
Model-rated selections
| Pick | Match | Selection | Odds | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Santa Clara v Braga Primeira Liga · 20 Sept, 17:00 UTC | Draw (X) | 1.38 | 99 | |
| Lech Poznań v Radomiak Radom Ekstraklasa · 20 Sept, 18:15 UTC | Under 5.5 goals | 1.85 | 99 | |
| AC Milan v Lecce Serie A · 20 Sept, 18:45 UTC | Under 3.5 goals | 1.68 | 99 | |
| Marseille v Paris Saint Germain Ligue 1 · 20 Sept, 18:45 UTC | Under 3.5 goals | 2.01 | 99 | |
| Barcelona v Getafe La Liga · 10 Oct, 16:30 UTC | Under 4.25 goals | 1.81 | 99 | |
| Belgrano de Cordoba v Estudiantes de Río Cuarto Liga Profesional · 20 Sept, 22:15 UTC | Under 2.5 goals | 1.60 | 87 | |
| SK Brann v Bodø/Glimt Eliteserien · 20 Sept, 17:16 UTC | SK Brann to win | 2.18 | 83 | |
| KV Kortrijk v SK Beveren Belgian Pro League · 20 Sept, 17:16 UTC | Over 1.5 goals | 2.44 | 82 | |
| Augsburg v Bayern Munich Bundesliga · 10 Oct, 13:30 UTC | Under 4.5 goals | 1.92 | 81 | |
| Lecce v Bologna Serie A · 11 Oct, 13:00 UTC | Under 2.5 goals | 1.88 | 81 | |
| RB Salzburg v Rheindorf Altach Austrian Bundesliga · 18 Oct, 12:30 UTC | Under 3.5 goals | 1.83 | 81 | |
| Borussia Dortmund v Werder Bremen Bundesliga · 9 Oct, 18:30 UTC | Under 3.5 goals | 1.93 | 79 | |
| Rapid Wien v Hartberg Austrian Bundesliga · 16 Oct, 17:30 UTC | Under 3.5 goals | 1.72 | 79 | |
| Real Salt Lake v New England Revolution MLS · 27 Sept, 01:30 UTC | Under 3.5 goals | 1.61 | 75 | |
| Flamengo v Bragantino-SP Brasileirão · 20 Sept, 21:30 UTC | Under 3.5 goals | 1.66 | 74 | |
| Atlético Huracán v Aldosivi Mar del Plata Liga Profesional · 4 Oct, 00:30 UTC | Under 2.5 goals | 1.60 | 74 | |
| Manchester United v Tottenham Hotspur Premier League · 10 Oct, 16:30 UTC | Manchester United to win | 1.75 | 71 | |
| New York Red Bulls v St. Louis City SC MLS · 26 Sept, 23:30 UTC | Under 3.5 goals | 1.80 | 70 |
Score is our screener's rating of the gap between the model's fair odds and the best available price. Selections update twice a day; matches that have kicked off drop out on the next rebuild.
What this tool is honest about
An accumulator multiplies odds, and it multiplies the bookmaker's margin with them. Four legs at a typical 5% margin each bake in roughly 19% of combined margin — before a ball is kicked. That is why accas pay so well when they land and why most of them do not, and no amount of model rating changes the arithmetic. The hit-rate figure above is the model's own estimate of how often your specific slip should win: it falls fast as you add legs, which is the point of showing it.
What the model genuinely contributes is leg quality. Each selection here scored well on the gap between our fair odds and the best available price, and the range is capped at 3.00 because our own v1 model went 0-for-8 on double-digit prices before we learned that lesson publicly. Restricting the pool to measurable edges is the only defensible way to build one of these.
If you want the underlying maths, the accumulator guide works through it with examples, and the acca calculator handles any slip you build elsewhere. Our complete settled record, losing streaks included, is on the track record page. Stake small; 18+.
Acca builder FAQ
How does the AI acca builder choose legs?
Every selection comes from our model's screener: it prices each fixture from time-decayed team scoring rates, blends that with market prices, and scores the gap against the best available odds. This page shows the highest-scoring selections in accumulator-friendly odds ranges, one per match, so you can assemble a slip from rated picks rather than hunches.
Does combining AI picks improve my chances?
No — and any tool claiming otherwise is selling something. Combining legs multiplies both the odds and the bookmaker margin while multiplying win probability downwards. Four legs at a genuine 60% each win together about 13% of the time. The builder shows that number as you add legs precisely so the trade-off stays visible.
Why are long-odds selections excluded?
Because betting markets systematically overprice longshots and our own first model version lost eight straight on double-digit odds before we capped it. The builder sticks to 1.20–3.00 selections, where the model has measurable edge and the maths behind an acca is at least defensible.
Should I bet the acca you build?
Treat it as entertainment with a known cost, staked small. Our full settled record — including losing runs — is published on the results pages, and accumulators are structurally the most expensive product on any betting menu. Singles preserve more of whatever edge exists.